First, for a man who is campaigning as an outside the Beltway candidate, I find it curious that Governor Romney selects a man with no private sector experience to be a heartbeat away from the Presidency. Rep. Ryan has as much private sector experience as the President, which appears to contradict a central criticism many have of the President of having no private sector experience.
As one who has both educational credentials (Masters of Public Policy) and professional experience (6 years consulting government agencies) as a policy wonk, I am intrigued that Rep. Ryan is on the ticket since he is perhaps the most noted policy wonk in the Beltway. However, he is not well known outside the Beltway. So name ID will be an issue outside the GOP base. Additionally, the policies he has crafted, mainly through his work as Chairman of the House Budget Committee, are so idiosyncratic in the concepts, not the details, that they can be easily blurred by his opponents. Currently, Rep. Ryan's proposal to offer a premium support program in Medicare for those under 55 is easily obfuscated by his opponents as fundamentally destroying the program for seniors by the idea that Medicare will change. I'll be interested how the Romney/Ryan ticket will combat that charge. As a reader of this blog says who has experience in these matters, Romney appears to be "leading with his chin" on this one.
So in the end, while I am intrigued by Romney's pick and think it will excite the base to a large extent, I would rather have had Romney choose a Governor such as a Bobby Jindal (my preference) or Bob McDonnell who has executive experience outside of Washington than an inside Washington policy wonk with little name recognition outside the political junkie crowd. In short, I find myself in this position when thinking about Mitt's decision.
1.5 headscratches?
ReplyDeletePerhaps Romney treated the VP pick like he would hiring someone at Bain and selected the best man for the job? I'm fine with it. I'll just be thrilled to see a Biden-Ryan debate.
ReplyDeleteWe could be entertained in a VP vs. Ryan debate. But again, who decides who to vote for Prez by who's the running mate?
DeleteIt's a good pick. Ryan is very competent, as much as Jindal or McDonnell. He might even turn some key Midwestern states to Romney. He can cut through the Obama campaign's off-issue smears and keep the debate more focused on the economy.
ReplyDeleteFor school this year, I'm going to be studying goverment, Because the election is this year....
ReplyDeleteRandom fact, since you want me to comment so bad. :P